1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

A. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning the instant case is next to the judgment of the first instance.

It is the same as the judgment of the court of first instance except for amendments as stated in the following Paragraph 2 and adding the judgments in the court of first instance, and it is also accepted by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. Part 1) The amendment of the judgment of the first instance court is deemed to be a witness of the first instance trial, both of which are referred to as “the witness of the first instance trial”; 2) the phrase “ March 1, 201” of the first instance judgment No. 4 of the first instance court judgment No. 17 is deemed to be “ May 1, 201;” and the phrase “from May 11, 2011 to May 11, 2012” of the first instance judgment No. 19 as “the sales proceeds from May 1, 2011 to April 30, 201,” respectively; and the phrase “the sales proceeds from September 30, 2012” of the second sentence of the second sentence is immediately added to “the sale proceeds from September 30, 2012.”

3) The wages and retirement allowances of the first instance court No. 4, 23, i.e., the wages and retirement allowances of the 5th and the 13th and 14th, respectively, are as follows. Article 9 is added to the “instant contract” of the 7th and 17th of the first instance judgment.

2. The judgment attached thereto: (a) Each statement or image of Gap evidence Nos. 23 through 37, 85, 86, 88, and 89 (including each number), which the plaintiff pointed out at the trial of the court, sold rice tea products in excess of the amount already paid by the defendants.

It is insufficient to deem that the Defendants were liable to pay the wages that the Plaintiff paid to the promotional members, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise, and the Plaintiff’s ground for appeal that continues to exist in this part cannot be accepted.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.