(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.10.20 2017나8793 | 리걸엔진

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.10.20 2017나8793

임금

Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against plaintiffs B and C shall be modified as follows:

The defendant, the plaintiff 1 B, 30.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

A. The reasons why the court should explain the cited part of this case are as follows.

As stated in paragraph (2), the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revised and the judgment in the trial shall be added to the judgment of the court of first instance, other than the following paragraph (2), and it shall be cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act as it is.

B. Part 1) The witness of the judgment of the first instance court is both deemed to be a witness of the first instance court. 2) The part of the 6th judgment of the first instance court, which deleted the part inside the 2 and 3 lines of the 6th judgment of the first instance court, and the Defendant Company of the fourth 5 first 5 added “the Defendant Company” to the front of the 4th 5th judgment including the number, except where the number is indicated especially in the case.”

3) On May 10, 201, the standard employment contract of the first instance court No. 6, No. 13, and No. 14, stating that the Plaintiff’s wages are KRW 2,50,000 in the standard employment contract of the “B” up to May 10, 201, and that the Plaintiff’s wages are KRW 2,50,000 in the standard employment contract of the first instance court No. 6, “the standard employment contract of the first instance court No. 13 and No. 14.” (hereinafter “the standard employment contract of the first instance court No. 18”) and “the same side” are deleted.

4) The part of the first instance court’s first instance court’s “in order to avoid a claim on the basis thereof” is “as part of the performance of the obligation,” and the part of the first instance court’s second through fourth is deleted. 5) The part of the first instance court’s first instance court’s first instance court’s 7th and the 6th 7th instance court’s 7th judgment stating that “the Defendant was not paid wages from the Defendant Company,” and that the Defendant was not “from the Defendant Company,” was “from the first instance court’s 10 and 11th instance court’s 1st instance judgment,” and that the Defendant continued to work without any specific objection without receiving any wage for several years or wages.

6. The first instance court.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-서울고등법원 2018.01.12 2017나2051649

-서울고등법원 2017.11.10 2017나2040885

-서울고등법원 2017.12.08 2017나2035234

-대구고등법원 2017.01.06 2015누7440

-서울고등법원 2018.07.13 2018나2000082