1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B indicated in the separate sheet No. 1, 2, 5, 6, and 53.00 square meters among the three floors of real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1.

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. 1) The Plaintiff is a housing redevelopment improvement project with the housing redevelopment project district of the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 32,729.70m2 as the housing redevelopment project district (hereinafter “instant rearrangement project”).

(2) The head of the competent Gu obtained the authorization of the project implementation on April 9, 2009 and the authorization of the management and disposal plan on April 14, 2014, respectively. The head of the Gu publicly notified the above management and disposal plan on April 17, 2014. (2) Defendant D was the owner of the 5 and 6 real estate stated in the separate sheet, and Defendant F was the subject of cash settlement.

Defendant B, among the 53.00 square meters on the third floor in the same list of real estate (owner I), connects each point of the (A) section of the attached map No. 1,2,5,6, and 16.52 square meters, and Defendant C, in turn, has occupied each leased object as of the date of the closing of the argument in this case, each of the items of (B) the attached map No. 2, 3, 4, 5, and 2 among the 53.00 square meters on the third floor of the above 1 real estate; Defendant B, as each lessee of the real estate No. 6 real estate indicated in the same list No. 1; Defendant B, as of the date of the closing of the argument in this case.

Attached Form

Each real estate recorded in the list is located within the project implementation district of the instant rearrangement project.

3) On May 22, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application for the adjudication of expropriation with the owners of each of the above real estate, including Defendant D, and received the adjudication of expropriation on each of the real estate stated in the separate sheet from the local Land Tribunal of Seoul Special Metropolitan City (the date of expropriation July 10, 2015), and on June 16, 2015, deposited the total amount of each of the compensation stipulated in the above adjudication as the owner, as the deposit, I, Defendant D, J, and Defendant F. [the grounds of recognition, Defendant 1, 2, 4.]

6. Each confession: Defendant 3.

5. : Facts without dispute, Gap's entries, 1 through 4, 6, 7, 9, 14, 15, 16, 18, 5 and 8, and the purport of the whole pleadings, and the purport of the whole pleadings;

(b) judgment;