1. The Plaintiff:

(a) Defendant B real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 2;

B. Defendant C shall set out the same list 3,4.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a cooperative established around August 2007 for the purpose of implementing a housing redevelopment project (hereinafter “instant rearrangement project”) with a housing redevelopment project district consisting of 32,729.70 square meters in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul. The Plaintiff obtained authorization for the implementation of the project on April 9, 2009 and authorization for the management and disposal plan on April 14, 2014 from the head of the competent Gu. The head of the Gu publicly announced the above management and disposal plan on April 17, 2014.

B. Defendant B was each owner of the real estate Nos. 1, 2, and 3 and 4 as indicated in the attached list, and Defendant C was subject to cash settlement.

Defendant D is the part inside the ship connected in sequence 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 of the attached drawing among the 75.60 square meters on the 1st floor of 5 real estate (owner K) recorded in the same list; Defendant E is the 15.6 square meters of the part inside the ship connected in sequence of the 134.36 square meters of the 4th floor of the 6 real estate indicated in the same list; Defendant E is the 52.1 square meters of the part inside the ship connected in sequence of the 5th floor; Defendant F is the 3.1,2, 3, 4, and 100 square meters of the attached drawing among the 75.6 square meters of the above 6 real estate in order of 1, 52.1 square meters of the housing unit; Defendant G is the 34.5 square meters of the leased real estate; Defendant G is each connected part of the 105 square meters of the attached drawing on the 7th floor in the same list; Defendant G is the 14.52, 14,5414,5444.

Attached Form

Each real estate recorded in the list is located within the project implementation district of the instant rearrangement project.

C. The Plaintiff filed an application for adjudication of expropriation with the competent local Land Tribunal on May 22, 2015, in order to ensure that the transaction agreement with the owners of each of the above real estate, including Defendant B, is not reached.