logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2010. 12. 08. 선고 2009누40157 판결
토지판매영업을 하고 받은 판매수수료를 사업소득으로 볼 수 있는지 여부[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Suwon District Court 2009Guhap2734 ( November 19, 2009)

Case Number of the previous trial

Cho High Court Decision 2008J3481 ( December 23, 2008)

Title

Whether the sales commission received for the land sales business can be viewed as the business income;

Summary

The initial disposition imposed on the sales commission in an independent position on the ground that it has not registered as an independent business operator with respect to the sales commission received according to its performance, and that it has received a fixed wage every month from a specific business operator and withheld and paid labor income tax, etc. is justifiable.

The decision

The contents of the decision shall be the same as attached.

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of claim

The Defendant’s imposition of global income tax of KRW 71,356,530 for the year 2005 against the Plaintiff on July 1, 2008 and KRW 60,191,040 for the global income tax of KRW 2006 shall be revoked.

2. Purport of appeal

Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part of dismissing the Plaintiff’s dismissal is revoked. The Defendant’s imposition of KRW 71,356,530 on July 1, 2008 on global income tax of KRW 46,459,860 on global income tax of KRW 71,356,530 on global income tax of KRW 46,45,860 on global income tax of KRW 60,191,040 on global income tax of KRW 206 shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgments of the first instance;

The reason why a party member should explain this case is the same as the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is citing this in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. Consultations

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow