logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.09.22 2017고단4909
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 15, 2017, the Defendant: (a) committed theft with one resident registration certificate owned by the victim E set up in front of the “D” entrance in Suwon-si, Suwon-si; (b) one copy of KEB’s physical card; (c) one new card; (d) one of Hyundai OB’s point card; and (e) one of the male gate’s 20,000 won in the market price contained in the KB National Bank Security Card; and (e) one of the male gate’s 10,000 won in the market price on which the wall was set up.

2. On July 15, 2017, the Defendant in violation of the Act on Financial Business Specializing in Fraud and Credit Financial Business (hereinafter referred to as “H Inn”) committed by the Victim G in Suwon-si F on July 15, 2017, as set forth in paragraph (1), with the said E’s KEB, which stolen as set forth in paragraph (1), presented one physical card to the victim as if the Defendant was the legitimate licensee of the said card, and calculated accommodation expenses.

The victim deceivings the damaged person and received accommodation services equivalent to the market value of 50,000 won from the damaged person, and used stolen debit cards.

In addition, from that to July 13:26, 2017, the Defendant received property equivalent to the total amount of KRW 139,000 from the injured party or acquired property benefits through the same method six times in total, and used stolen debit cards.

3. On July 16, 2017, the Defendant, at around 03:00, found one copy of a resident registration certificate owned by the victim K, which was lost by the victim K, in the vicinity of the J main station located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and one male wall for which the market price is unknown.

Defendant 1 did not take necessary procedures such as returning the above acquired property to the victim and embezzled the property as he had on his own mind.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each statement in E, L, K, G, M, N,O, and P;

1. The protocol of seizure of police;

arrow