1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the amount ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case is to add "accident" to "accident 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance" (hereinafter referred to as "accident 3.5 of the judgment of the court of first instance), "the result of the commission of physical examination to the director of the court of first instance" (hereinafter referred to as "the result of the commission of physical examination to the director of the court of first instance"), "the result of the commission of physical examination to the director of the L Hospital" among the grounds for the third judgment, "the result of the commission of physical examination to the director of the court of first instance", "the part 6.5" as "6 consolation money", "the calculation table of the amount of damages in attached Form 8

(a) modify paragraphs (2) and (3) as follows, and paragraph 2:

A. 5) Other than adding Paragraph 5 as follows, it is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, and thus, it shall be cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. [Attachment] (2) Income and Labor Capacity Loss Rate A is recognized to have an income equivalent to KRW 1,663,376, which is an urban daily wage at the time of the accident, as sought by the said Plaintiff from the date when he/she reaches 22 years of age to the date when he/she reaches 60 years of age, as the maximum working age.

In addition, in full view of the evidence No. 8-12 or 26 of the evidence No. 8-2, the inquiry results of the inquiry into the L Hospital director of the court of first instance, and the purport of the whole pleadings, the plaintiff A may recognize the fact that there is a reflect of the whole world as of the date of the closing of argument in the court of first instance, and it constitutes a clear and obvious trend that remains permanently. Therefore, it is reasonable to regard the labor disability ratio of the plaintiff A as 5% according to the 14th class 3 (the remaining person who remains a shaking of the body of the arms) of the attached Table No.

3 According to the result of physical examination by the court of first instance on L Hospital Head of the L Hospital at the court of first instance, it is necessary to conduct two anti-defluent removal and four-time racing treatment on the part part of the plaintiff A as he has an anti-defluence on the part of the plaintiff A's satch, satch, sub-satch, sub-satch, left-hand and left-hand part, and require a total of KRW 2,865,970 for the operation and treatment.