logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.06.26 2018가합578438
손해배상(건)
Text

1. The suspension of qualification granted to the Plaintiff A on February 4, 2017 and suspension of qualification granted to the Plaintiff A for 20 years, and suspension of qualification granted to the Plaintiff C.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a juristic person established with the aim of contributing to improving national health, physical well-being and E development through research and dissemination of E. The Plaintiffs, as the Defendant’s regular members, served as the Defendant’s director, and Plaintiff A and C as the Defendant’s auditor, from February 20, 2016 to February 3, 2018.

B. F was elected as the president at the ordinary meeting of February 20, 2016 by the Defendant at the ordinary meeting of February 20, 2016. G, the former president, forged the general meeting minutes, and raised suspicion that F was registered as a director by changing G to the Defendant’s corporate register.

On April 9, 2016, the Defendant held a board of directors to determine whether F was unlawfully registered, and decided that F's performance of duties is suspended until it constitutes an emergency countermeasure committee and the F's performance of duties is decided.

C. Meanwhile, F continued to perform the duties of the Chairperson of the Defendant, asserting that the Emergency Countermeasure Committee is an illegal organization without any ground in its articles of incorporation, and the case in which the Plaintiff, A, and C filed a complaint with F due to fabrication of private documents, etc. (U.S. District Prosecutors’ Office 2016 type No. 70242) regarding illegal registration (U.S. Military Prosecutors’ Office 2016 type No. 702) was all suspected on December 14,

On February 4, 2017, the Defendant opened a law firm committee and the board of directors, and decided on the suspension of qualification and the suspension of branch offices for the following reasons (hereinafter “the primary disciplinary action”), 20 years for the Plaintiff C, 15 years for the suspension of qualification and the suspension of branch offices for the reasons indicated in the following subparagraphs (1) through (4), 3 through (6) and 15 years for the Plaintiff B, 3, 4, 6, and 10 years for the suspension of qualification and the suspension of branch offices for the reasons stated in the following subparagraphs.

After July 3, 2018, the Defendant notified the Plaintiffs of the instant primary disciplinary measure.

(1) A disciplinary cause shall interfere with the Association's intentional business by stealing illegal cash from the Association's unauthorized intrusion and the passbook. (2) An illegal intrusion into the Association, thereby hindering the Association's intentional business.

arrow