1. On February 2, 2018, the Defendant confirmed that a resolution on the suspension of qualification against the Plaintiff is null and void.

Facts of recognition

The Korea Amateur Athletic Association has 17 City/Do Sports Association as a branch, and among them, it has the Gangwon-do Sports Association.

The Gangwon-do Sports Association has members of member sports-related organizations, and the defendant Association is a member sports-related organization affiliated with the Gangwon-do Sports Association.

The defendant association has 18 Si/Gun/Gu organizations under its jurisdiction, and among which C associations belong eight E including D.

In order to establish matters concerning the organization and operation of the City/Do Sports Association, the Korea Sports Council has regulations on City/Do Sports Association, and the Gangwon-do Sports Association has regulations on member sports groups, and the defendant Association has regulations on defendant Association in order to determine matters concerning the organization and operation of the defendant Association.

In addition, the Korean Olympic Committee and the Gangwon-do Sports Council have separate regulations for each sports fairness committee established for the management of the regulations of organizations, reward and disciplinary action against organizations and individuals.

(A) Of the above provisions, the part related to the instant case (which was in force at the time of the original decision) is as shown in the relevant provisions.

D On December 25, 2016, the Commission held a punishment committee and passed a resolution on the suspension of qualification for one year on the grounds that F voluntarily selected the electoral group and persons subject to adjudication education without consultation with D.

On February 9, 2017, the Defendant Association’s Sports Process Committee re-examines the above disciplinary action against D and decided that F, a managing director of the Defendant Association, would invalidate the above disciplinary action on the ground that F, a managing director of the Defendant Association, did not consult with D and did not constitute a cause of disciplinary action.

Furthermore, on February 2, 2018, the Defendant Association Sports Process Committee holds a committee to take disciplinary action against the said D.