The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On April 13, 2010, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the above court 2008Gadan92753, which filed against D’s wife, and took an oath against D’s above court 2008Gadan92753, which was conducted against D’s wife, and thereafter presented a false statement contrary to memory as follows.

1. The Defendant testified that “The amount that the witness borrowed to the Plaintiff is essential. According to the Defendant’s preparatory document, the Defendant testified that “The degree of KRW 80 million was 80 million and 50 million was repaid.”

However, the fact is that the defendant borrowed 50 million won from the above D on November 14, 1996 and was remitted 49.7 million won, and there was no fact that he borrowed 80 million won from D and 50 million won was repaid.

2. The Defendant testified that “The witness has paid interest on KRW 50 million, but he has paid interest on KRW 289.5 million to anyone who has paid the interest on KRW 28.9.5 million,” “I have paid interest on KRW 30 million to the Plaintiff.”

However, the fact was that 30 million won was borrowed from D on October 7, 1996, and 289.5 million won was not remitted. Therefore, there was no other difference in interest on loan 30 million won.

3. The Defendant testified to the witness that “I cannot say, because the witness did not lend money to the witness, the Plaintiff did not deposit the witness in the passbook by lending money to the witness. I cannot say,” and that “I are memorying that the Plaintiff issued the check. I are issued.”

However, when D lends 30 million won to G around October 7, 1996, D transferred 2,8950,000 won from the Defendant’s account after deducting interest from the Defendant’s account, as a means to pretend that the Defendant would lend money, and D directly prepares for the check.