logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.02.13 2012가단105235
용역비
Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 3,345,97 as well as 5% per annum from October 2, 2013 to February 13, 2014, and from the next day.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a corporation whose purpose is indoor interior interior interior interior interior interior fishery business, indoor building business, design service business, etc., and the Defendant is a corporation that establishes and operates C University (hereinafter “instant school”).

B. On July 14, 2011, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant for the installation of a rest room in the future of the instant school, setting the contract amount of KRW 364,80,000 as the contract amount from July 14, 201 to August 29, 2011.

C. After entering into the said contract for construction works, the Plaintiff and the Defendant entered into a contract for the alteration of the interior work contract with the term of the contract from July 14, 201 to September 19, 201, changing the contract amount to KRW 397,100,000.

On July 27, 2011, the Plaintiff submitted to the Defendant a document on the commencement of the construction of the future creation room of the instant school.

E. On September 20, 201, the Plaintiff submitted to the Defendant the completion system for the installation of a rest room in the future of the instant school.

F. On July 17, 2012, Defendant D sent a telephone call to the Plaintiff’s representative director E.

G. On July 18, 2012, E visited the instant school to confirm the administrative officers and buildings of the Defendant F, G, D, and the instant school, and future creative center building, and took photographs.

H. D sent, on July 19, 2012, to E, the title “administrative and future creative hall interior request” to E, by means of an e-mail, the instant school administrative officer and future creative hall drawings related to the interior of the instant building.

I. On July 26, 2012, the Plaintiff sent to D a Ptx file (hereinafter “instant work file”) stating “C University Environment Improvement Project Proposal - A07-25-3.”

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts that there is no dispute between the parties, each entry of Gap evidence 1 through 9 (including paper numbers), each entry of Eul evidence 1 through 5, each video of Gap evidence 10 to 13 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiff's assertion (1) The plaintiff's claim for service costs following the conclusion of design service contracts (A).

arrow