logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.12.09 2014나11437
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to the revoked part shall be dismissed.

Reasons

1. The following facts are not disputed between the parties, or acknowledged in full view of the following facts: Gap evidence Nos. 3, 20, 23, and Eul evidence Nos. 3 and the fact inquiry results with respect to the C dental clinic of the court of first instance, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

The defendant is a dentist who operates a dental hospital.

B. On April 9, 2012, the Defendant: (a) performed cryptive surgery to the Plaintiff, whose cryptive cryptive cryptive cryptive cryptive cryptive cryptive cryptives; and (b) on December 20, 2012,

C. From December 20, 2012 to May 12, 2013, the Defendant treated the Plaintiff’s fluoral therapy on the left side of the upper left side of the Plaintiff’s fluoral disease nine times.

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment thereon

A. The plaintiff asserts that the defendant is responsible for compensating the plaintiff for the damages for the king treatment expenses, future treatment expenses, consolation money, etc., which the defendant suffered by the plaintiff, since he did not completely treat the king's spawn's spawn's spawn's spawn's spawn's spawn's swn's swn's swn's swn's swn's swn's swn's swn's swn's s

However, there is no evidence to prove that salt certificates generated by the plaintiff's right-hand side of the upper left-hand side were caused by the causes or circumstances identical to the plaintiff's above assertion.

Rather, in full view of the overall purport of the arguments as a result of each written request for examination of the medical records against the evidence Nos. 1 through 5 and the head of the Busan University Hospital of the first instance, the Defendant discovered that there was a salt in the Plaintiff’s upper left side before commencing the supplementary treatment, and provided neutic treatment to the Plaintiff, while manufacturing the supplementary metal in advance for the reasons of shortening the treatment period and scenic view, and manufacturing the supplementary metal in advance for the reasons of the Plaintiff’s upper part.

arrow