logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.03.28 2018구합52389
부당해고구제재심판정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part arising from the supplementary participation.

Reasons

Details of the Review Decision

A. The Plaintiff (hereinafter “Plaintiff bank”) is a financial institution that was established on September 17, 1981 and ordinarily employs approximately 3,500 workers, and is engaged in business prescribed by the Banking Act.

Defendant Intervenor (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) joined the Plaintiff Bank on January 9, 1995, and served as an employee in exclusive charge of personal customers from October 13, 201 to October 12, 2016, Gwangju Metropolitan City Pungam Branch, Standing Branch, and Gwangju Branch.

B. On January 10, 2017, the Plaintiff bank recognized the following disciplinary grounds to the intervenors (hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason Nos. 1 through 4”) and determined disciplinary dismissal, and notified the Intervenor on April 6, 2017 that “the Plaintiff shall be dismissed on the same day in accordance with the penal provisions.”

(hereinafter “instant dismissal disposition”). The Intervenor filed an application for review, and on May 23, 2017, the Review Disciplinary Committee decided to maintain the instant dismissal disposition.

(1) On September 24, 2012, from September 24, 2012 to February 4, 2014, 18 items, including 11 items, 2 items, 4 items, and 18 items, including 11 items, 2 items, and 4 items, which were produced by an agent for verifying the actual names of his/her own account and affixed his/her personal seal impression to his/her agent during the period from September 24, 2012 to February 4, 2014, were voluntarily provided to customers. In particular, on March 8, 2013, 2013, there was a fact that he/she sold Dls products to D customers using the non-review product guide stating that “the probability of principal loss” is 0%, and that on March 8, 2013, the amount was prepared by an agent for verifying the actual names of his/her own account and affixed his/her personal seal impression to his/her agent (hereinafter “the name and seal impression of his/her agent”).

arrow