logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.02.21 2017고정907
자동차손해배상보장법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.2 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2017 High 907" is a holder of BST5 car.

No motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance shall be operated on a road.

Nevertheless, on March 16, 2016, the Defendant operated the foregoing vehicle that was not covered by mandatory insurance on the front side of the same Gu D, around April 4, 2016, around 13:50, and around 15:50, around 15:50.

The defendant of "2017 High 908" is a person who drives a BST5 car.

No motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance shall be operated on a road.

Nevertheless, on August 20, 2016, around 16:30, the Defendant operated the said car from around 1k to around 2, 5430, from around 1431-1, to around 5430, the members of the Jung-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu.

Summary of Evidence

[2017 High Doz. 907]

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. A report of occurrence (Violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation);

1. A self-written report on each offense, a written statement of operation of each vehicle, inquiries into mandatory insurance, relevant photographs, 2017, 908;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Application of a self-regulatory report and mandatory insurance-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 46 (2) 2 and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Compensation for Damages of Motor Vehicles which are selected, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The criminal defendant committed the same crime several times for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and the various sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, as stated in the records and arguments, shall be determined by comprehensively taking account of the following factors:

arrow