logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.04.22 2016고단963
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and for a fine of five million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

The defendants are the defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A, operating a key room with the trade name “D” located on the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Branch, advertised the same place of business in the Internet site E, F, etc., and employed female employees, such as G (n, 20 years old).

From May 2014 to October 12, 2015, the Defendant arranged commercial sex acts by having male customers find their places receive 70,000 won per hour in return for the act of similarity, and by having the said G, etc. do the acts of similarity, such as taking the sexual organ of customers in hand and scambling them, from August 2013 to December 2, 2013.

2. Defendant B: (a) around October 12, 2015, around 18:00, the Defendant paid 70,000 won for sexual traffic; and (b) engaged in sexual traffic by engaging in similar teaching activities that see the Defendant’s sexual organ as his hand and scambling in the above G (the age of 20).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officer in G;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (suspect A criminal proceeds and calculation of additional collection charges);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

(a) Defendant A: Articles 19 (2) 1 and 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Arranging Sexual Traffic (Concurrent Imposition of Imprisonment and fines)

B. Defendant B: Article 21(1) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts (i.e., the choice of punishment, the same kind of fine and the two times before and after the same punishment),

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, each of the Defendants’ detention in a workhouse

1. Suspension of execution (Defendant A) Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (The following grounds shall be considered as favorable to the reasons for sentencing);

1. The observation of protection and community service order (defendant A) Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The former part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic (Defendant A) and Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;

1. Punishment of an act, such as collection (defendant A) of sexual traffic;

arrow