Text
All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.
Reasons
1. The facts charged in this case
1. On December 30, 2013, Defendant B assaulted Defendant B’s chests on the ground that he was engaged in the on-site appraisal of the civil litigation in Jinju-si D’E located in Jinju-si, on the ground that he was engaged in the on-site appraisal of the civil litigation, and caused both descendants to conduct his own appraisal.
2. Defendant C, at the above date and time and at the above place, assaulted Defendant C’s chest by having tight hand three times, on the ground that Defendant C and other Party A were probed for probled B, and was pushed down with one another.
3. Defendant A
A. The Defendant was in the process of appraising B and defect repairs at the aforementioned time and place.
In addition, C assaulted the right hand hand of her on his own hand on the ground that C continues to be tightly in spite of his own restraint.
B. The facts after assaulting C, such as the former defamation, even though there was no fact that the female committed an act of assaulting C, thereby damaging the reputation of the female by openly pointing out false facts by assaulting C, and by openly pointing out sound on the job where many people, such as the one-man B, etc., exist.
2. The facts of the assault committed by the Defendants B, C, and A are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the intent expressed by the victim under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. The facts of defamation committed by the Defendants A and the crimes falling under Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act cannot be prosecuted against the intent expressed by the victim under Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act. As such, the Defendants can be acknowledged to have withdrawn their intent to punish each other by attending this court on January 22, 2015. Thus, all of the indictments against the Defendants are dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.