Each of the instant public prosecution against the Defendants is dismissed.

Defendant A (the age of 37, South) is a driver of C white franchiser HG, Defendant B (the age of 51, South) is a bus engineer of old bus D, and the Defendants are mutually defective persons while driving the said vehicle.

1. On January 6, 2020, the Defendant stopped from around 17:31 to 17:36 slope from Gumi Si, and on the road No. 1 in F. C, a bus engineer, during the operation of the vehicle in the C, while driving the vehicle in front of the F.C. 1, the Defendant stopped in front of the bus operated by the victim, and entered the bus in front of the bus operated by the victim, with a lush hand, fing the victim’s upper part of the part. The Defendant 1 was ske down the part of the victim’s left part of the bus, tightly sealed the victim’s front part of the bus, and ske the victim’s part of the part on his hand against it, and ske the victim’s left part of the bus.

On the other hand, the victim tried to keep the victim on board his own vehicle among the practical ditches, and assaulted the victim on the other hand by selling two parts on the left side of the victim.

2. Defendant B, on the same date and at the same place as in the above “1”, committed assault, such as the victim of the bus that he was listed in the bus that he operated, and the victim’s neck part of the bus that he operated, and the victim’s flusium continued after the end, and the victim’s flusium was fluenced by hand, and the victim’s clothes were flusent.

Judgment

The facts charged in this case are crimes falling under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the will expressed by the victim under paragraph (3) of the same Article.

As the Defendants expressed their intent not to punish the other party on February 21, 2020 after the prosecution of this case against each other as victims of this case, the Defendants are dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.