logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.11.27 2014구단56157
요양불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 25, 2013, while working as a viewing street cleaners, the deceased A (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) arrived at the cleaning zone near the south-gu mobile party at port at port on March 25, 2013, and the same worker moved to the cleaning zone while coming to the toilet, but at around 06:50, he was moving to the toilet, and at around 06:50, he was coming from the face by the club worker.

(hereinafter referred to as “first accident”). (b)

After dividing the East Workers and the Dolances, the Deceased was cleaning and the office and the house, and around 08:03 on the same day, the Deceased completed the primary filming of the two books and completed the first filming of the two books to the Mandong Hospital, and was generated in front of the literature while going to the emergency room.

(C) On April 15, 2013, the Deceased filed a medical care application with the Defendant on April 15, 2013, alleging that “the instant accident was caused by the so-called “the so-called “the second accident.” The Deceased filed a medical care application with the Defendant on the following grounds: (a) the so-called “the so-called “the so-called “the so-called two-round injury” (hereinafter referred to as the “instant injury”). On July 22, 2013, the Defendant did not have any circumstance to deem that the deceased’s disease was related to his duties while performing his duties; (b) the so-called “the so-called the so-called the so-called “the so-called injury” caused the so-called “the so-called the so-called two-round injury” due to the so-called “the so-called the so-called “the so-called injury” caused by the so-called “the so-called injury” in a medical institution to treat the me.

hereinafter referred to as "disposition of this case"

E. The Deceased filed a petition for review against the instant disposition, but was dismissed on January 14, 2014, and the petition for review was dismissed on June 9, 2014.

F. Meanwhile, on June 27, 2015, the Deceased died during the instant lawsuit. At the time of death, there are no spouse and four children, and the Deceased among four children.

arrow