1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the subsequent order of payment shall be revoked.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On September 21, 2016, Defendant A driven buses around 17:44 (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) and tried to change the lane into two lanes in order to have passengers aboard the two lanes located in the front of the D High School located in Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, by driving the bus on September 21, 2016, and tried to change the lane into the two lanes in front of the D High School located in the Hancheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun. Defendant A was unable to drive the network E (hereinafter “Plaintiff Oba”), from the rear side of the two lanes, after stopping over the two lanes.

On the other hand, the deceased reported the stopping of the Defendant’s vehicle, and stopped the Plaintiff’s Otoba while getting out of balance and getting out to port.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

The Deceased suffered an injury, such as an open wound, etc., of an external wound, an external wound, and an accident of this case. The Deceased suffered an injury, such as an open wound, etc.

From the date of the instant accident, the Deceased was hospitalized in G Hospital (hereinafter “first hospitalization”). From October 11, 2016 to March 5, 2017, the Deceased was hospitalized in the G Hospital (hereinafter “first hospitalization”). (c) After the Deceased’s death, he/she was discovered on April 9, 2017 as he/she was gypted in the house and was found to have no consciousness, and was hospitalized in the G Hospital after being hospitalized in the same day. On the same day, he/she was diagnosed as having been diagnosed in the two thromatic dys of trauma, external thromatic throssis, external throssis, and external cerebral throssis, and was hospitalized after being hospitalized in the H Hospital (hereinafter “second hospitalization”). From April 9, 2017, he/she was killed by a shock at around May 30, 2017, when he/she was hospitalized in the hospital (hereinafter “second hospitalization”).

The Plaintiff is an insurer of the national health insurance that provides insurance benefits in accordance with the National Health Insurance Act, and the Deceased is a national health insurance policyholder, and the Defendant B’s organization (hereinafter “Defendant Association”) is a mutual aid insurer who has entered into a motor vehicle mutual aid contract for the Defendant

E. The Plaintiff is related to the health insurance benefits as indicated below.