1. As to the Plaintiff A’s KRW 1,019,40, Plaintiff B, C, D, and E, respectively, and each of the said money on September 21, 2016.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1) On September 21, 2016, a bus driver without a name is the Defendant’s vehicle on September 21, 2016 (hereinafter “Defendant’s vehicle”).

(ii)The driver’s license of H High Schools in Hongcheon-gun G and trying to change the two lanes in order to have the passengers located in the two lanes in the front side of the H High School in the middle side of the second two lanes in front of the H High School in Hongcheon-gun G, and the network I (hereinafter referred to as “the network”) in the latter side of the second two lanes.

3) The Plaintiff’s JOba (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s Oba”) is deemed to be driving.

) The deceased discovered the progress and stopped on the 1st and the 2nd two-lanes of the above road, and carried passengers. On the other hand, the deceased stopped on the part of the defendant's vehicle and stopped the plaintiff's vehicle, while the plaintiff's vehicle stopped on a sudden basis, the plaintiff's vehicle lost a balance and was placed on the left side (hereinafter referred to as "the accident in this case").

(2) As a result, the Deceased suffered from an injury, such as an open wound, etc., to which he/she was hospitalized in K Hospital from the date of the instant accident (hereinafter “first hospitalization”) and discharged on October 11, 2016, and received a outpatient treatment until March 5, 2017.

After that, on April 9, 2017, the Deceased was found to be in a state without food, and was found to be in a state without food, and was diagnosed at K Hospital on the same day on the same day with two eromatic eroscopic eroscopic eroscopic eroscopic eroscopic eroscopic eroscopic eroscopic eroscopic eroscopic eroscopic eroscopic eroscopic eroscopic eroscopic eroscopic eroscopic eroscopic eroscopic eroscopic eroscopic eroscopic erosc

3) The plaintiff A’s spouse, the rest of the plaintiffs are the deceased’s children, and the defendant is the mutual aid business operator who has entered into a motor vehicle mutual aid agreement with respect to the defendant’s vehicle (based on recognition). [In the absence of dispute, Gap’s evidence Nos. 1 through 6 (including number,

No. 1, as a whole, the entire pleadings.