logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2014.11.17 2014고정297
상표법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall deliver, sell, forge, forge, or possess a trademark identical with or similar to another person's registered trademark for the purpose of using or making another person use such trademark on goods identical with or similar to the designated goods.

At around 16:30 on March 2, 2014, the Defendant: (a) registered as designated goods a trademark (registration number: 0380592); (b) registered as a trademark (registration number: 0380592); (c) 6; (d) 16; (d) 21; (d) 1; (e) 1; 6; (f); (d) 10; 10; 10; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 2; 2; 35; 305; 35; 31; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 452618; 1; 2: 4; 4; 4; 1; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 5; ; 4; 5; ; ; 4; 4; ; 4; ; ; 5; ; ; ; 5; ; ; ; ; ; );

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Records of seizure, lists of seizure and photographs of seized articles;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each original trademark register;

1. Relevant Article 93 of the Trademark Act concerning facts constituting an offense and the choice of punishment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 97-2 (1) of the Trademark Act that is confiscated;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant was committed at the time of and against the crime, that the defendant appears to have committed the crime in this case under the sufficiently economic condition, that the forged goods have been entirely seized, and that the defendant has suspended the illegal business in the same way.

arrow