beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 6,900,000 as well as 5% per annum from November 23, 2013 to February 9, 2017 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. The following facts do not conflict between the Parties:
The deceased B(hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) was hospitalized in C Hospital from November 28, 201.
However, on August 21, 2013, the Deceased was hospitalized and transferred to the emergency room of the Defendant Chungcheongnamnam University Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).
B. At around 11:00 on August 21, 2013, the Deceased fell from the floor of the shooting belt.
C. The Deceased suffered from an injury to blood transfusion due to the above abortion. D.
On November 23, 2013, the Deceased died from the Defendant Hospital as a multi-growth donation.
E. The deceased, a bereaved family member, was the Plaintiff and D. D, upon the death of the deceased, transferred both the deceased’s damage claim and the consolation money claim incurred to the Plaintiff, which was inherited due to the death of the deceased, to the Defendant hospital in the instant litigation procedure.
2. Determination as to the occurrence and scope of liability for damages
A. As to the occurrence of the liability for damages, the medical staff of the Defendant hospital had a duty of care to prevent the patients from being dead at the time of radiation photographing, and as seen earlier, the deceased suffered a bodily injury while being exposed to the radiation photographing, and the injury suffered by the deceased was caused by the negligence of the medical staff of the Defendant hospital.
Next, this paper examines the causal relationship between the deceased's death and the injury caused by the death of the deceased.
In full view of the overall purport of the arguments on the written evidence No. 4 and No. 1 as well as the written evidence No. 1 as to the president of the Korean Medical Association, the deceased was hospitalized at the Defendant Hospital for the treatment of severe bathing near the bones, the deceased at the time of the emergency room of the Defendant Hospital was glance, but at the time of the emergency room of the Defendant Hospital, the deceased did not have any verbal reaction, but could have been changed or flicked with another person’s aid. The deceased was glick after the accident of this case.