logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.05.25 2016고단1357
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 12, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, driving a drinking person on the front day of Suwon-si, Suwon-si on February 17:10, 201, and raising time and time expenses.

“The police box of the Suwon Police Station C, which received the report of 112 and called, requested the Defendant to take a alcohol test, and the police box of the Suwon Police Station C, which used the breath of the said D to take a bath to the said D, and used the breath of the breath to commit violence twice.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports and criminal investigations by police officers.

2. On February 12, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence of drinking), driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking alcohol, smelling the F's vehicle to the Defendant's e-mail, blocking the F's vehicle under the Defendant's e-mail while drinking on the front side B of Suwon-gu, Suwon-si on February 17, 2016, and driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking alcohol, drinking on the Defendant, drinking on the face, reding on the face of the police box of the Suwon-gu Police Station C, which was dispatched after receiving a report of the same content as the indicated in paragraph (1) from D, while driving the aforesaid F and the motor vehicle.

인 정할 만한 상당한 이유가 있어 음주측정기에 입김을 불어 넣는 방법으로 음주 측정에 응할 것을 요구 받았음에도 부는 시늉조차 하지 아니하고 도리어 제 1 항 기재와 같이 위 D을 폭행하여 이를 회피하고, 같은 날 17:26 경과 17:36 경 공무집행 방해 혐의로 현행범인 체포되어 인치된 수원시 팔달구 G에 있는 수원 서부 경찰서 C 파출소에서 역시 위 D으로부터 2 차례에 걸쳐 음주 측정에 응할 것을 재차 요구 받았음에도 역시 부는 시늉조차 하지 아니하는 방법으로 이를 회피하여 정당한 사유 없이 경찰공무원의 음주 측정요구에 응하지 아니하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Investigation report (verification of black boxes and video images);

1. Application of statutes on field photographs;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and Article 136 of the choice of punishment.

arrow