1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. The reasoning for this part of the court’s liability for damages is the same as that of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, thereby citing this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

2. The scope of liability for damages is limited to the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following parts, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(A) In the judgment of the court of first instance, the part concerning “actual profit loss” in the judgment of the court of first instance seems to have been partially increased due to a unit price change of urban daily wage after the judgment of the court of first instance. However, the Plaintiff claimed the amount recognized by the court of first instance as it is and did not appeal as to passive damages. The Defendant’s assertion regarding the number of months of operation after the age of 60 is rejected). The “attached Form” in the judgment of

Part 18 of the 7th page “from the date on which the plaintiff ends the pleadings of this case to the date on which the pleadings of this case are closed to the following end.”

Inasmuch as there is no evidence to deem that the Plaintiff spent the above expenses by the date of the closing of argument in this court, it is reasonable to authorize the Plaintiff’s total amount of KRW 40,368,998 as indicated in the attached Table “The Statement of Calculation of Treatment Costs” to the extent that the Plaintiff’s future medical expenses claim is reasonable within the scope of recognition, in view of the fact that from September 25, 2020 to April 11, 2042, the date following the date of the closing of argument in this case.

From 10th to 19th 10th 19th 19th 19th 206.

It is reasonable to deem that, from September 25, 2020 to April 11, 2042, the Plaintiff needs to open 8 hours a day (based on the urban daily wage of the general public department) by an adult one adult from September 25, 202, the date following the date of closing the argument in this court.

(2) Accordingly, 627,511,015 won in the future, calculated as follows, shall be recognized.

C. Therefore, the sum of the Plaintiff's opening costs is 641,481.