Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On June 201, the Defendant supplied the materials necessary for the construction of the G fishing village village to F, the husband of the victim, in the “E” building materials company operated by the victim D, the Gyeongjin-gun, the Seocho-gun, the Seocho-gun, the Defendant: (a) demanded the original office to pay the materials with the tax invoice issued on the last day of the delivery month; and (b) demanded the original office to pay the materials directly by the last day of the next month.
“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”
However, in fact, the Defendant did not think that the Defendant would have the Defendant paid the amount of the tax invoice issued by the victim directly to the original office before the original office, and there was no idea that the Defendant would have the Defendant paid the amount of the material to the victim, and there was a circumstance that the personnel expenses of the father were delayed due to the accumulated deficit at several construction sites, so there was no intention or ability to pay the amount properly
The Defendant received materials equivalent to KRW 561,00 at the market price, including 10 pipes, from the injured party on June 6, 2011. From that time, the Defendant was supplied with construction materials equivalent to KRW 33,718,10 on a total of 35 occasions from August 10, 201, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached crime list.
Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim to take the property by deceiving the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police against D;
1. Application of the statutes on the details of materials supply;
1. In light of the fact that the punishment is imposed in accordance with Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act regarding the crime in light of the following: (a) the value of the reason for the defraudation of the punishment (the option of imprisonment) and the fact that the long-term damage has not been restored; (b) the punishment is not legally binding to give an opportunity to recover damage by repaying KRW 3 million on May 15, 2017; (c) the payment of KRW 100,000 on June 12, 2017; and (d) the payment of KRW 100,000 to the late time is