A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant ordered Kimcheon-si's order and ordered damage to manage the site of " Kimcheon-si Cir (hereinafter "the construction of this case")" performed by us in Korea. In around 2014, the Defendant: (a) constructed Bad, etc. as the owner of the building in Gyeongbuk-si, Kim Jong-si; (b) constructed Bad, etc. as the owner of the building in 2014; and (c) constructed Bad, etc. as the owner of the building in Gyeongcheon-si, Gyeongcheon-si, Gyeongcheon-si, Gyeongcheon-si, Gyeongcheon-si, 2016; and (d) issued electronic tax invoices as if they were put into the site of this construction; and (d) decided that the above companies receive the construction payment from the victim and thereby exempted the Defendant from liability.

On April 20, 2016, the Defendant issued an electronic tax invoice and demanded the victim to claim the cost of materials to the company, as the G (State) supplied the materials to the victim company in relation to the instant construction project, by stating that “The supplier G (State) and the supplier (State) supply price of the article 8,04,200, the tax amount of KRW 804,200, and the tax amount of KRW 804,420,” to the representative H at the construction site of this case located in G (State) Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si.

However, the fact is that the material supplied by G (State) was used by the Defendant in the 2014 Police Corporation, etc., and it was irrelevant to this construction project, so the victim company did not have any obligation to pay the above price.

The defendant deceiving the victim company by issuing the electronic tax invoice as above and claiming the above H to pay to the victim company, and is subject to such deception from the victim company.

5. Around 20.20. H received a remittance of KRW 8,848,620 from the Defendant’s debt and thereby acquired profits equivalent to that amount.

Accordingly, the defendant from around the above day to the same year.

5. Until December 25, 200, a total of 45,848,620 won was acquired through five times, such as the written list of offenses.