logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.10.14 2016고단2320
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 12, 2013, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 5 million by the Changwon District Court on the charge of violation of the Road Traffic Act, etc., and a summary order of KRW 5 million by the same court on April 14, 2014.

1. On May 21, 2016, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol by 0.149% in blood without obtaining a driver’s license at around 02:10 on May 21, 201, and driving B Maz car at a level of 500 meters in front of a restaurant in the trade name, Kimhae-si, Kimhae-si, and the road in front of the same waterway sloping Station.

2. Around 02:10 on May 21, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was found to have driven a drinking vehicle in front of the above water king; and (b) was discovered to have been requested to sign a notice of the report on the situation of the driver’s license and the personal portable information terminal (PDA) connected to the traffic police computer network from the police officer C of the Kim Sea Police Station C, and the personal portable information terminal (PDA) connected to the traffic police network.

On the premise that the Defendant may be detained due to the power of punishment twice due to drinking driving, the Defendant signed the Defendant’s personal information on E, the Defendant’s personal information on E in the driver’s circumstantial statement column, entered E in the name column, and signed the Defendant’s personal information on E in the driver’s name column, and signed the Defendant’s personal portable information terminal that confirmed and signed the fact of driving under the influence of alcohol with 0.149% of the blood alcohol concentration.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged the part of the driver column in the G’s circumstantial statement report under the name of E, which is a private document concerning a certificate of fact, and forged E’s signature.

3. The Defendant’s events of the above investigation documents and the above investigation and signature events include the part of the forged driver’s column to D with the police officer in charge who is aware of the forgery at the same time and place as the above 2.

arrow