A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 2, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 17:50 on April 2, 2017, at the Busan Southern Police Station civil petition office of the Busan Southern Police Station, 319 times in a way 81, and (b) on duty on holidays, there is no kind of civil petition charges for B while on duty.

At the same time, I ambling in the state of alcohol and see, “I do not know of the name of the book. I do not know of the book.”

In doing so, “Cropic weather” and “Cropic weather,” and assaulted him, on the ground of any chemical that had been laid on the table, such as threatening him as he collected.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate performance of duties concerning civil petition reception duty by the police who is a public official B.

2. On April 2, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 17:57 on April 2, 2017, to the Seoul Southern District Police Station: (b) “The name of the captain was changed to YYYYY YYYYYYYYYYY ACT,” and (c) “I want to be changed to D, but may not know of it.

In the phrase, “the name of the son may also be known to the son,” and the hand floor of “C’s son shall be at least once, and “the bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a wall

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties concerning C's work for the entrance of a police station, which is an auxiliary police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol against B and C;

1. The investigation report (as to the report of the person prior to the transfer of this case) and investigation report (as to the attachment of CCTV images and fire extinguishing photographs taken in the course of committing the crime of the suspect) / [the defendant has not used violence to police officers at the time]. The facts acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court are as follows: (i) the statement of B and C is specific and it is difficult to find any motive to mislead the defendant; (ii) it conforms to the facts charged, such as CCTV images; and (iii) the defendant threatened the victim with the efficiencies.