A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 31, 2018, around 19:20 on October 31, 2018, the Defendant: (a) prevented the Defendant from entering the C police station, who was working for C police station D, and D, and E, who intended to enter the police station, and (b) interfered with the legitimate performance of duties of the auxiliary police station, in his/her hands, when he/she was fluored with D’s body, flags, flads, flads, flads, flads, flads, flads, flads, and flads, and flads in his/her hands, when he/she was fladsed with E’s eye, he/she interfered with his/her duty.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal report (CCTV image attachment);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (including the fact that there was no previous conviction exceeding the fine, contingent crimes, and the degree of interference with the execution of official duties was relatively unhued, and the health situation is insufficient);