logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2013.08.28 2013고단360
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 29, 2009, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) from the original branch of the Chuncheon District Court on December 29, 2009, and on April 4, 2013, the Seoul Western District Court received a summary order of KRW 3 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving).

1. Around 20:10 on June 6, 2013, the Defendant driven a C rocketing car while under influence of about 700 meters of alcohol without a vehicle driver’s license, from the parking lot at the high-speed sea station at the original-speed speed of the city to the front-speed of the charging station at the original city from the parking lot at the high-speed sea station at the original city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the Gu of the Gu of the Gu of the Gu of the Gu of the Republic of Korea.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) (hereinafter “Dangerous Driving”), although the Defendant was in an inaccurate state of drinking and difficult to drive normally, such as putting a red light on its face, he was driving a rocketing car and led it to bypass from the direction of AKF to the prime audience.

At this point, traffic control is a private-distance intersection where the victim D (the age of 38) was driving, and the EKazon car driven by the victim D (the age of 38) was stopping for the signal atmosphere in the three-lane, so the driver had a duty of care to prevent the accident by driving safely, such as driving the front side and reducing speed.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to breath and proceeded with the front door without living well, and the lower part of the Defendant’s vehicle’s left side was shocked by the victim’s pentle.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s occupational negligence caused the victim D to suffer approximately two weeks of light salt, etc., and the victim F (V, 33 years of age) who was on board the damaged vehicle to receive approximately three weeks of medical treatment, and the victim G (9 years of age), and the victim H.

arrow