A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for seven months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. From around 17:00 on May 31, 2017 to 18:00 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) the Defendant: (b) the victim E, the main owner of the flag, attempted to fat the Plaintiff, who fatd the Plaintiff, while taking a bath to the said customer; (c) the Defendant fatd the Plaintiff, who fatdd the Plaintiff, by drinking the fat, and fatd the Plaintiff, and fated the Plaintiff, who fatd the Plaintiff, and fatd the Plaintiff, and fatd the Plaintiff, who fatd the Plaintiff, and fatd the Plaintiff, and fatd the Plaintiff, who fatd the Plaintiff, and fatd the Plaintiff, and fatd the Plaintiff, who fatd the Plaintiff, and fatd the Plaintiff, and fatd the Plaintiff, who fatd with the bat at the bar, and fatd the Plaintiff.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate operation of the victim by force.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the same place around 18:20 on the same day, and was dispatched after receiving 112 reports at the same place, and was asked by G in the circumstances belonging to the F District of the Busan East Police Station F District, Busan, and asked questions about the background of the crime, the Defendant’s “influence” on the ground that the Defendant’s attempt to interfere with the performance of official duties was obstructed by the foregoing G on the ground that he would interfere with the Defendant’s attempt to assault E, who is the captain of the flag.

Bah caused death. The inside of the old Central Information Department H was playing together with the old Central Information Department H, police officers are small.

As a result, the death was used as a "breath, and assaulted by breath, such as breaking a bat of G with bather hand, and intending to satch a drinking face.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the prevention and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. One of the grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter “Suspension of Execution of Official Duties”) is a suspended sentence.