beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On July 17, 2016, at around 15:00, the Defendant argued that the Victim C and the E, known in the Nam-gu Seoul metropolitan area, were to be the trial cost due to a failure, and that the Defendant would not have such Baduk.
”라고 말하고 그 자리에서 나오던 중 피해자가 “ 뭘 잘못했는데 그렇게 말하느냐
Mate means why is why they would be two pages or why they would be.
As stated in “the victim’s bath, he saw the victim’s breath with her hand, and boomed the victim’s breath with her hand, and boomed the victim’s breath with his her breath, and boomed the victim’s breath of the left breath in need of approximately 6 weeks of treatment.
Summary of Evidence
1. The legal statement of the witness C;
1. Medical certificates, medical records, records, answers to inquiries, and answers to factual inquiries;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing damaged photographs;
1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (1) of the choice of punishment;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;
1. The judgment of the defendant and his/her defense counsel on the assertion of the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 32 (1) 3 and Article 25 (3) 3 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Lawsuits to Reject Application for Compensation Order (the scope of liability for damages is not clear) and Article 25 (3) 3 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Lawsuits
Even the defendant's act constitutes a legitimate defense.
However, in full view of the above evidence, the facts that the defendant inflicted an injury on the victim can be sufficiently recognized, and in light of the background leading up to the dispute between the defendant and the victim, the attitude of the defendant's act and the degree of injury on the victim, etc., the defendant's act does not constitute a defense act against the victim's unfair attack. Thus,