logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.12.28 2015고단5120
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 9, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 4 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Busan District Court, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 7 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Busan District Court on August 14, 2014. On January 7, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a penalty of KRW 7 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Ulsan District Court on January 7, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a suspension of execution of eight months for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (license for a violation of the Road Traffic Act) and the judgment becomes final and conclusive on January 15, 2015.

"2015 Highest 5120"

1. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act is a person engaging in driving a CMF rocketing car.

On May 9, 2015, the Defendant driven the said vehicle while under the influence of alcohol of 0.234% without obtaining a driver's license on May 21, 2015, and driven the said vehicle into the North-gu ice Center at the entrance of the North-gu Northern-dong, Busan.

At the time, motor vehicles were parked on both sides of the road, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the front, rear, left, and right and right of the driver and the steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and did not properly see the power and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right are under the influence of liquor and did not operate the steering system accurately, and conflict with the FESM3 car owned by the victim E, who was parked in the front of the driving of the Defendant. The FM3 car proceeds in the future due to its shock, and then conflicts with the HM3 car owned by the victim G, which was parked in the front of the driving of the Defendant.

arrow