logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2020.08.14 2020고단745
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On November 1, 2019, the Defendant was issued a summary order of a fine of three million won by the Jeju District Court for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On March 5, 2020, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (Driving without a license) and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) on or around 02:10 on March 5, 202, while under the influence of alcohol at a level of 0.156% of blood alcohol level, the Defendant driven a vehicle with low alcohol level from C front of the road located in Seopopo City B to D in Seopo City at Seopo City, and violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act at least twice.

2. On March 5, 2020, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from D Driving) driving a motor vehicle with blood alcohol level of 0.156% under the influence of alcohol level on March 5, 2020, and led the road in front of Seopopopo City to G from the F (F) surface.

At the time, there are many vehicles that are parked around, and in this case, there were duty of care to prevent accidents by reducing speed and accurately manipulating the steering direction and brakes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to perform the above duty of care while driving under the influence of alcohol and went beyond the center line due to occupational negligence, and went into the front part of the Defendant’s driving of the said vehicle. The Defendant, as the Defendant was tightly driving of the said two-way LK3 car owned by J, which was parked later, had the front part of the said two-way truck, and continued to have the front part of the said K3 car, which was parked later after the said K3 car, as the vehicle was pushed down, and the front part of the said K3 car in his management, which was parked later than the said K3 car, became the rear part of the said K3 car. The Defendant’s shock part of the said K3 car in his management, which was parked later than the said K3 car, was turned into the rear part of the said K3 car.

arrow