The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The facts charged in this case

A. On July 9, 2012, the Defendant, at the music work room in Gangnam-gu Seoul, destroyed the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts through an information and communications network for the purpose of slandering, by posting the Defendant’s Internet NAB as the title “a harming the misunderstanding of the misunderstanding of C(D, E, etc.)” and “C was placed beyond the misunderstanding of C(D, E, etc.).”

나. 피고인은 2012. 7. 17.경 위 ‘가.’항과 같은 장소에서, 인터넷 디씨인사이드의 ‘악기갤러리’ 게시판에 “아 C 누군지 모르려나 E 말하는 거다. 쟤가 나 고소했다. 그냥 싸이코 같다. 이유도 없이 경찰서가야된다. 상당히 짜증이 났다. 그래도 친구라고 불쌍해서 고소까진 안하려 했는데 ”라는 글을 게시함으로써, 비방 목적으로 정보통신망을 통하여 공연히 허위의 사실을 적시하여 피해자의 명예를 훼손하였다.

C. On February 4, 2013, the Defendant posted a letter “F” in the same place as the above “A”, “F”’s Internet music clubs’ job offers, and comments on the job-seeking bulletin board on “I wish to communicate with a fluenent one’s speech, f.e., to recruit people to engage in the same music.” On the other hand, if you have a defect, I have the honor of sending a f.e., f., letters with the other people’s number. If you have a f.e., a f., a f., if you have a f.e., a f., a f., if you have a f.e., a f., a f.,

2. The above facts charged cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s will specifically manifested pursuant to Article 70(2) of the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc.