Defendants are not guilty

A. On June 3, 200, while the above apartment management office had held a temporary Dong representative meeting related to the election of Dong representative, there were 20 members, such as Dong representative and apartment residents, and they had damaged the honor of the victim by openly pointing out false facts by openly stating the same end as the above paragraph (a).

(C) On June 28, 2011, the Defendant damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts by making the horses of the above paragraph (a) while at least 20 persons, such as the Dong Representative and apartment residents, etc. attend a regular meeting at the above apartment management office.

(2) On October 15, 2011, the Defendant posted the title “I” on the F apartment website bulletin board, and damaged the reputation of the victim by revealing publicly false facts through an information and communications network for the purpose of slandering the victim, stating that “The Defendant was in a situation that would not have any choice but any choice but any more than five million won of the advertising cost and any one million won of the advertisement cost) from the Gull Advertising Business Operators on May 24, 201.”

(B) On April 3, 2012, the Defendant posted a notice of the title “O” on the bulletin board of the Internet homepage, and offered that “P” was to have the Defendant divided one million won by one million won as the victim would have received two million won from H because he would have received two million won from H,” but, notwithstanding the fact, the Defendant offered that “G would have received two million won from the complainant (Defendant) with the back money and divided one million won by one million won, but it was clearly rejected by the complainant,” stating that “The complainant rejected it, but the complainant clearly rejected it,” and made a false statement openly through an information and communications network for the purpose of slandering the victim.