A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 29, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 6 months at the Incheon District Court for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, etc., and the judgment was finalized on September 6, 2014.

1. Around February 11, 2012, the Defendant posted a statement on the Defendant’s Twitter using a mobile phone, stating that “The Defendant was in the family of the Defendant, which was located in the Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong 1106 and 702, and was in the military service of the Japanese Army” in the Defendant’s Twitter, even though the Victim was not a pro rata or was in the military service of the Japanese Army.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts through the information and communication network with the aim of slandering the victim.

2. Around February 13, 2012, around February 13, 2012, the Defendant posted a notice on the Defendant’s home, stating that “C is a pro rata and part of a family, and the Japanese Army was sent to Japan during the Japanese occupation period,” on the bulletin board of “E” on the portal site operated by the Defendant using a computer, although there was no fact that the victim C was a pro rata or a Japanese Army superior.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts through the information and communication network with the aim of slandering the victim.

3. Around February 18, 2012, around August 18, 2012, the Defendant posted a notice on the Defendant’s home, stating that “C is a pro rata and part of the Defendant’s portal site, and sent the Japanese Army leader to Japan during the Japanese occupation period,” on the bulletin board “E” following the Defendant’s portal site, although there was no fact that the victim C was a pro rata or a Japanese Army leader at the time of the Defendant’s home.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts through the information and communication network with the aim of slandering the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's oral statement;