Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On June 10, 2016, at around 23:50, the Defendant was asked about the case from the police box D, the police box called up after receiving the report of domestic violence, and the police box E, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol to the police officer D and the police officer E. under the influence of alcohol.

“Along with the fact that the parts of the head of the Da, the head of the Da, the head of which was cut off, 2 minutes, and the Doctrine of the Doctrine and the Doctrine of which were divided into the Doctrine and exceeded the Doctrine of the Doctrine.

The defendant continued to be subject to the above violence from the Gyeong K, and the defendant used the Gyeong K in such a way as "I see how I am dead," and used the gale E by saving the gale E in a so-called gale, dividing it into two minutes, and making I am above the floor of the gale E.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. E statements;

1. A report on investigation;

1. A criminal investigation report (a notification of the department related to the report of 112 case shall be attached);

1. On-site investigation report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (to part of damaged police officers' damage and to attach photographs of damaged articles);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act obstructs the execution of official duties by assaulting police officers on the ground of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the extent of assault against the police officers is relatively significant. The defendant confessions the crime of this case and reflects it. Although there were several previous violent crimes, it is favorable to the defendant that there was no particular criminal record during the last ten years.

In addition to the above circumstances, all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case are as follows.