A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 7, 2016, from around 03:00 to around 03:20 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victim D (38 taxes) (the head of the business division of the said main point at C (38) before the entrance of C main points in C main points in C main points in C main points in C main points in C main points in C main points in C main points in C main points in B; (b) expressed the victim’s desire to “I gate, ring, inside the inside Gun, she shall do so; (c) out of the main points in C main points in C main points in C; and (d) carried the victim’s head, skeing the victim’s head, sealed the victim’s head, and pushed the victim’s neck on two consecutive occasions; and (d) made it impossible for customers under C to enter the said age club by assaulting the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the duty of the injured party's effort business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and Article 314 of the choice of punishment: Selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The part dismissing a public prosecution under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Act on the Protection, Observation, etc. of Social Service Orders;

1. On May 7, 2016, the Defendant: (a) under the influence of alcohol at C’s main points located in Won-si, 03:00 on May 7, 2016, the Defendant: (b) took a bath to the victim D (38 taxes) (the head of the said main points; (c) taken the victim’s bat; (d) towed the victim’s bat; (d) towed the victim’s head head, ske, and pushed the victim’s bat on two occasions; and (e) assaulted the victim’s batf by having the victim’s head sat.

2. The facts charged in this part of the judgment shall not be prosecuted against the clearly expressed will of the victim as a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act.

Since the injured person expressed his intention not to punish the accused after the public prosecution of this case was instituted, this part of the public prosecution is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.