logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원(제주) 2013.07.17 2012나1087
매매대금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, except for the addition of "No. 7-2 and 3 of evidence No. 7-3 of the judgment of the court of first instance to the 5th and 21th of the judgment of the court of first instance, and addition of "No. 5-2 and 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance" to the 5th to the 6th of the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, it is identical to the corresponding part of the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance.

h) Furthermore, G and I testified to the effect that the actual purchase price for the instant land and buildings was determined as KRW 2.9 billion in the process of the criminal trial of the first instance trial of the said fraud case against the Defendant and C [the Jeju District Court Decision 2012Da205, 2012 Gohap257, 257 (Joint)] at the trial date and as the police stated in each existing statement at the trial date.

A person shall be appointed.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow