Cases where there is a justifiable reason to believe that a violation of the Design Act is not a crime under the law;

Cases where there is a justifiable reason to believe that a violation of the Design Act is not a crime under the law;

Article 16 of the Criminal Act

Defendant

Prosecutor

Busan District Court Decision 80No2907 delivered on December 16, 1980

The appeal is dismissed.

The prosecutor's grounds of appeal are examined.

According to the judgment of the court of first instance, the defendant, as the representative director of the non-indicted corporation who manufactured the above 197 articles, has no choice but to believe that the above 17 articles were non-indicted 5's surface and that the non-indicted 5's surface was non-indicted 9's surface and that the non-indicted 1's surface added 5's surface was non-indicted 7's surface or non-indicted 7's surface added 9's surface and the non-indicted 1's surface added 7's surface added 9's surface was non-indicted 5's surface and that the non-indicted 5's surface added 9's surface was non-indicted 7's surface added to the non-indicted 5's surface and the non-indicted 1's surface added 9's surface and the non-indicted 5's surface added to the non-indicted 1's surface was non-indicted 9's surface and thus, the non-indicted 5's surface added to the above 1's surface.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Shin Jong-young (Presiding Justice)