Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff is operating “D” at the first commercial building in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and the Defendant is operating “E” at the same commercial building.
1. On May 16, 2014, the Defendant damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false information in the manner of delivering printed materials in which the victim (referring to the Plaintiff; hereinafter the same shall apply) sold 4,000 won per piece of electric material type light, etc., without having sold 4,000 won per piece of electric material form, etc., the Defendant: (a) even though the victim (referring to the Plaintiff; hereinafter the same shall apply), “4,500 won per piece of electric material type light, etc.; and (b) the members of the members of the organization using light light, etc., at large risk.”
2. On June 28, 2014, the Defendant damaged the victim’s reputation by publicly pointing out false facts to the effect that “The president of the M company A did not replace the victim with the second-class female toilet gate construction work, and instead replaced with the second-class female toilet gate construction work,” even though the victim had not replaced the security guards L with the second-class female toilet gate replacement work,” in the commercial parking lot, the Defendant did not change the victim into the second-class female toilet gate construction work.”
3. Around June 30, 2014, the Defendant: (a) distributed printed matter written by the Defendant, “G” business owner H and N” business owner H and “N,” to the victim’s normal progress of construction work; (b) distributed printed matter in the form of inserting down the store door below the store door, thereby impairing the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts.
B. On July 15, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of two million won including the criminal facts of defamation against the Plaintiff (hereinafter “each of the instant defamation”).
(U.S. 2015 High Court 2015 High Court 562). The defendant dissatisfied with the appeal, but the judgment dismissing the appeal on January 20, 2016.