logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.07.15 2015고정562
명예훼손
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant’s defamation against the victim C is a business owner running the store “E” at the first shopping mall in Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and the victim C (Nam and 67) is a business owner operating the store “F” in the same shopping mall.

On May 16, 2014, the Defendant injured the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false information in a way of openly delivering printed items indicating “4,500 won per piece of electric material type, etc., and the members of the members of the sales center,” although the victim did not sell 4,00 won per piece of electric material type, light light, etc., which is electric materials, to the management office G at the D apartment complex management office.”

B. On June 28, 2014, the Defendant damaged the victim’s reputation by publicly pointing out false facts to the head of the management office G in the above 4th floor management office, against the H “H” business owner I, K, and the head of the guard room in the 1st floor guard room, and against the security guards M in the commercial parking lot, even though the victim had not replaced the victim with the used goods at the time of replacing the 3th female toilet base in the commercial parking lot, “F C president was replaced with the used goods without replacing the change with the changeer while performing the 3th female toilet change work.”

C. Around June 30, 2014, the Defendant: (a) distributed printed matter written by the Defendant, “H” business owner I and N” business owner I and “N” business owner (“H”); (b) but (c) distributed printed matter written by the Defendant, “I and N, on May 27, 2014, without any construction trace; (d) 2.50,00 won withdrawal” under the store crepans, thereby impairing the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts.

2. The Defendant’s defamation against the Victim K is not prosecuted by the Suwon District Prosecutors’ Office on July 23, 2013, which filed a complaint against the Victim K (Nam and 61), the president of the said commercial building, who is operating the J in the said commercial building (hereinafter “J”).

arrow