logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2013.10.24 2013고정80
명예훼손등
Text

Defendants are not guilty.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On December 1, 2011, the Defendants conspired in collusion with the head of the management office of the victim F, and distributed to the occupants of the above apartment, a printed article stating that “The first instance court imprisonment (201No481) with prison labor due to the suspicion of sexual indecent act” was “the managing office of the first instance court (201No481).” Accordingly, the Defendants conspired with the head of the management office of the above apartment, thereby impairing the reputation of the victim F, who is the head of the above apartment management office. 2) On June 15, 2012, the Defendants did not have been revoked the qualification of the head of the management office of the victim F, nor did the head of the management office of the apartment in the above apartment bulletin board of the apartment, “The head of the apartment management office of the apartment of the Republic of Korea was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor of June 14, 2012 and the qualification of the head of the community service office of June 28, 2012.”

The Defendants posted the printed matter stating the false content, and distributed it to the occupants of the above apartment by inserting the printed matter in the mail of each household. Accordingly, the Defendants damaged the reputation of the victim by pointing out false facts. (b) On July 5, 2012, the Defendants in violation of the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc. (Defamation) conspired with the Defendants on the violation of the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc. (Defamation) and posted a false statement on the NA 14th June 2012, stating that the Defendant was admitted as the members of the E apartment occupants in the H office located in Chuncheon-si, without the cancellation of the qualifications of the victim F, that “the NA 14th June 2012, our apartment management office, which was decided in the final judgment of the Supreme Court, for six years of suspended sentence of imprisonment and for eight hours of community service work, and thus revoked the qualifications of the manager.”

Accordingly, the Defendants are the defendants.

arrow