logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2018.06.21 2018고단260
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, for a year of imprisonment for a defendant B, and for a period of six months of imprisonment for a defendant C, respectively.

except that this shall not apply.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On the premise of the facts, Defendant A is the actual operator of Company E for the purpose of construction work, civil engineering work, etc., Defendant B is the representative director under the name of the above company, Defendant C is the management and accounting department of the above company, and Defendant C entered into a contract with the Hongcheon-gun Office on May 18, 2016 with the F Company and submitted a shortage of funds for the company’s operation, and Defendant A received daily labor expenses from the Hongcheon-gun Office in accordance with “the system of classification, management, and confirmation of payment for labor expenses.” Defendant A, who prepared a false statement of payment of labor expenses to the Hongcheon-gun Office as if the actual employee did not work, submitted it to the Hongcheon-gun Office, and submitted the statement of payment of expenses for daily labor expenses to use them for the company’s operation expenses, and Defendant C demanded the payment of the funds from Defendant Hongcheon-gun to use them for the company’s operation expenses, and Defendant B received the funds from the Defendant Hongcheon-gun Office.

Criminal facts

1. Forging a private document or uttering of a falsified investigation document;

A. As stated in the foregoing premise, the Defendants conspired to make a false statement of claim for labor cost in the name of G in collusion with the above company office on the first floor of the H building in Seocho-si, Seocho-si on December 2, 2016. Defendant A and B ordered Defendant C to prepare a claim for labor cost for construction workers as if they had worked for the said construction site in the manner that Defendant C had not actually worked for the said construction site. Defendant C used the computer at the above company office as “the statement of claim for labor cost for August 1, 200” and “I, J, K, K,O, L, M, G, N, and N, claim for labor cost of KRW 37,750,00 in total working for the F construction site at the above company office” with the title “the above company office as “the statement of claim for labor cost of August 1, 200” and “the resident number, resident number of the foregoing eight,750,000 won” in the main text of the document.

arrow