logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.02.07 2016고단4093
사기
Text

Defendant

A A Fines of 2 million won, Defendant B of a fine of 4 million won, Defendant C of a fine of 8 million won, Defendant C of a fine of 4 million won and Defendant D of a fine of 4 million won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

C is the representative of H Co., Ltd., a corporation specializing in steel construction and soil construction in the third floor located in Busan-gun G 3th floor.

Defendant

A is a person who served as a deputy head of H from April 1, 2013 to June 2015 and served as a site warden belonging to K in Busan, which was operated by I from July 1, 2015 to January 30, 2016, and works again in H from February 2, 2016.

Defendant

B is a person who works for H’s commercial direct accounting staff from March 2014; Defendant D is the wife of Defendant C; Defendant E is a person who served as a site warden from March 31, 2015 to February 28, 2016.

1. On October 2015, Defendant C, Defendant B, and Defendant A were gathered to receive the payment of the cost of labor at H office in early October 2015, the victim’s Busan Metropolitan City Office, which was the site warden at the construction site of “L” that the victim’s Busan Metropolitan City Office contracted to K, and Defendant A, who was the site warden at the construction site of “L” that the victim’s Busan Metropolitan City Office entered Defendant B as a false worker, and claimed for the cost of labor at K.

According to the above mother, Defendant A was at the K Office on November 2015, and Defendant B did not have been employed as a daily worker at the above construction site around October 2015, and Defendant B did not have been employed as a daily worker at the above construction site. As such, Defendant B prepared a false statement of payment of daily labor cost as if he had worked for 14 days at the construction site and claimed the daily labor cost for the K Accounting staff in the manner of having him submit it to the ICU.

After all, Defendant C, Defendant A, and Defendant B conspired to deception a public official belonging to the office of ideas and ideas as above, and let a public official in charge transfer 1,540,000 won to the account under the name of K in the name of K in the name of labor cost for B around November 18, 2015, with the funds owned by the office of ideas and ideas. From November 18, 2015 to the new bank account under the name of B through K accounting staff who is aware of the fact. (1,390,90 won.)

arrow