logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2019.07.05 2018고단3477
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year;

However, the defendant A for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are not persons handling narcotics.

1. Defendant A

A. From March 16, 2018, around 01:20 on March 16, 2018, the Defendant transferred KRW 400,000 to the account designated by D Bank E-cashner in Gangnam-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City for the supply of a psychotropic drug in his name-free psychotropic drug (hereinafter “calcopon”) (FIDG; hereinafter “G”), and then transferred KRW 400,000 to the purchase price of writtenopon. At around 02:00 on the same day, the Defendant brought about approximately 0.5g of the Rophoneopon, which is contained in the plastic bag that the above G was attached to the tape.

Accordingly, the defendant purchased and sold philophones.

B. Around 14:00 on March 17, 2018, the Defendant for the first crime of violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. - Medication No. 1) - around 14:00, the Defendant dump dump dump dump dump dump dump in the Defendant’s house of Jung-gu Seoul, Seoul, and hump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump was dumped with tobacco, and the Defendant dump dump dump dump dump dum

around 14:00 on April 8, 2018, the third criminal defendant administered philophones in the house of the above defendant, and administered philophones in the same manner as that of the preceding paragraph.

2. At around May 13, 2018, the Defendants’ co-offendered the Defendants: (a) around May 13, 2018, within the guest room of the G hotel in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, and (b) in mind that Defendant A would administer the phiphones together, and (c) took part of the 0.05g of the 0.2g of the phiphonephones that Defendant A prepared in advance, and then, Defendant A injected on his arms and parts of Defendant B.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to administer philophones.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Relevant data, such as details of transactions by Defendant A, cash payment pages, and details of transactions by L Banks;

1.The research report and hosting dialogues.

arrow