beta
Text
1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months;
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A is a person who is engaged in driving of a car in C. C.
A. A. On May 28, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (or on the spot) and the Act on Traffic of Roads (or on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the Act on Traffic of Roads (or on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (or on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes), driving the said motor vehicle at the vicinity of the road
In this case, the driver has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the front and rear left and left, and the steering gear of the driver.
Nevertheless, the defendant did not fulfill the above duty of care and did not discover the EMW 528i car from the victim D (Y, South 52 years old) driving on the right side of the defendant, and changed the car as it is, due to the negligence in the course of business, the defendant received the above BMW car from the above BM passenger vehicle on each of the above BMW vehicle, and caused the injury to the victim, such as light salt, tension, etc. requiring approximately two weeks of treatment due to the shock. At the same time, the above BM passenger car was damaged to be 3,72,730 won for repair, and even if it was stopped immediately, the defendant escaped from the site without taking measures such as providing relief to the injured person.
B. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (not in action after an accident) and the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act due to occupational negligence in which he was unable to accurately operate the steering gear while driving a traffic accident, as seen above, the Defendant received the central separation unit installed in the said width vehicle at the said location, and damaged the central separation unit equivalent to KRW 1,429,000 for repair, and again, when the operation of the said width vehicle is impossible, the Defendant left the site without taking necessary measures such as arranging the site while leaving the said width vehicle on the road.
2. Defendant B is not subject to mandatory insurance for motor vehicles C.