A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

[2] On November 22, 2010, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million for a crime of violating road traffic laws at the Daejeon District Court, and on July 28, 201, a summary order of KRW 3 million for a crime of violating road traffic laws (driving alcohol) was issued by the Daejeon District Court.

[Criminal facts]

1. On February 1, 2017, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol content of 0.059% in blood, around 04:35, the Defendant driven a D-string car at the 1km section from the road front of the Cheongcheon-si Mancheon-si, the Mancheon-si, the Mancheon-si, the Mancheon-si, the Mancheon-si, the Mancheon-si, the Mancheon-si, the Mancheon-si, the Man-gu, the Man-do Man-do Man-ro

2. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving service of a motor vehicle in D pertaining to the width of the motor vehicle.

On February 1, 2017, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.059% during blood transfusion 04:35 on February 1, 2017, while driving the said car, and driving the first line of F in front of E in E in E in E in E in E in E, her speed at the speed from the friet to the friart eculation.

At the time, the road was the first lane in which the center line of yellow-ray was installed, and in such a case, there was a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle by observing the vehicle line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to operate the steering gear while under the influence of alcohol and failed to properly operate the steering gear, and was normally proceeded on the opposite lane due to the negligence of driving the central line.

G received the front portion of the HWz E300 car driven by the Defendant, the front portion of the car was driven by the Defendant.

After all, the defendant did not immediately stop and take necessary measures, even though he damages the above benz car owned by the victim Athath Capital Co., Ltd. by negligence in the course of performing his duties so that the amount equivalent to 2,053,480 won of the repair cost is damaged and the defendant left the site.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement in court;