logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 영동지원 2014.01.16 2013고단188
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On December 18, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of a fine of four million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daejeon District Court on December 18, 2007, and on February 12, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of four months for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Youngju District Court’s Yeongdeungpo-dong Branch on February 12, 2009. On May 9, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for a suspended sentence of eight months for a violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (a deadly weapon, etc.) at the Youngju District Court’s Yeongdeungpo-dong Branch on May 17, 2013, and the judgment became final and conclusive

【Criminal Facts】

At around 21:00 on September 22, 2013, the Defendant driven the Epid car under the influence of alcohol by 0.183% in the 7km section from around 124 meters away from the 124th day of the written assessment of the documents of the Cheongcheon-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, Macheon-do to the front road of the Macheon Police Station located in the same Macheon-gu, Sincheon-do, Sincheon-do.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of suspect on behalf of the defendant;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. A report on detection of a host driver;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Previous convictions: Criminal records, court rulings, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a copy of summary order;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines for the crime, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is the same criminal record as the statement of criminal records, and the crime of this case during the probation period is not good, but it is decided as per Disposition in consideration of the fact that the defendant driving a drinking to avoid assault from F and led the defendant to the Macheon Police Station, and that the defendant voluntarily surrenders to the crime of this case.

arrow